Saturday, December 6, 2025

Frank Gehry | The Aerie

frank geary

1929-2025


the aerie

by Douglas Messerli


 
The Walt Disney Concert Hall by night

 

In 2002 Howard and I were invited to the house of the Québec Government Representative, Marc Boucher. The evening began with a pleasant cocktail party. I recall that Boucher collected pictures of pigs, and had numerous of these paintings and drawings all over his home, perhaps even on the tie he wore that evening. At some point we were all gathered into a bus and transported to downtown Los Angeles where we attended “Varekai,” the newest extravaganza of the Cirque du Soleil. Although I recall some stunning production numbers, including the drop of a man with white wings into the center of the ring, I am not a particular fan of this kind of circus drama. Howard, however, did enjoy the evening, and I was certainly appreciative of the invitation.

     Over the next couple of years, we kept in touch with Boucher, and Green Integer eventually received a small grant from his Délégation du Québec for the publication of Quebecois author, Denyse Delcourt in 2005.

     Our second invitation to a Délégation event, however, occured before that, in December 2004, when, on the evening of the 16th, we joined Marc and a small group of invitees at Redcat (the Roy and Edna Disney-CalArts Theater) before a concert of the Los Angeles Philharmonic and the Chapelle de Québec of Handel’s Messiah in the Walt Disney Concert Hall.

     The performance was lovely, with a quite luminous quality to the singing of the Québec choir and wonderful solos by soprano Karina Gauvin, countertenor Andreas Scholl, tenor John Tessier, and bass-baritone Nathan Berg.


      But of even greater fascination to us is that among our party was the architect of the Disney Concert Hall, Frank Geary himself. At the pre-event downstairs, we were graciously greeted by Marc, who revealed to Howard and me that since we last saw him, his wife had left him. “I truly wish I were gay,” he openly laughed. “It would be so much easier to find a new companion than it is as a middle-aged heterosexual.”

     I spoke for a while to Frank Geary—we had met once previously at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art—before we were shepherded up the elevators to the concert itself.

     The halls were gloriously lit those few days before Christmas, and the ushers were admirably professional in their Concert Hall positions. What I hadn’t prepared for, however, was the fact that we were to witness this performance in the highest balconies of the Disney Concert Hall, which, since I suffer substantial vertigo, made it difficult for me to come and go down the narrow aisles, and even harder to stand to let others pass. All during the performance, I felt a bit as if I were that white-feathered Icarus from “Varekai,” about to fall into the audience below. And the famed tenor solo, “Comfort Me,” which I had myself sung as a youth, seemed inordinately appropriate to my own situation.

     As we entered the aerie, Howard and I were met by a handsome young black usher, smiling graciously as, seeing my discomfort, he offered to accompany us to our seats. “I love working here,” he proffered without any coaching from us.

     “Did you see that man that came in just before us?” Howard asked, pointing to Gehry as he stood at his nearby seat.

     “That’s Frank Gehry,” I added.


Inside the Concert Hall. The “aerie” is on the upper right

     Suddenly our young man blushed with genuine joy. “Really?”

     “You should introduce yourself to him at intermission,” Howard suggested.

     “Oh, I will,” he said. “Thank you for telling me.”

    At the intermission, I cautiously stood and moved toward the exit with the greatest of discomfort. The young usher was still standing there. “Did you meet him?” I queried.

     “Yes! He shook my hand,” he beamed.

     Both Howard and I smiled with delight.

     Despite my discomfort in our location, I perceived this aerie for the rest of the evening as joyful of a dwelling place, even if a bit dizzying, as sitting with the angels themselves. 

Los Angeles, July 14, 2009

 

 

  

 

 

 

Saturday, March 1, 2025

Emma Bernstein | Irresolvable Pulls of Life

emma bernstein

by Douglas Messerli

 

irresolvable pulls of life 

 

I knew the young writer, photographer, interviewer, and simply beautiful Emma Bee Bernstein since she was a baby. On my many visits to her parents, often staying at Charles and Susan’s New York apartment, I watched her grow up from a often-crying baby, to a young child who for a short period was almost fixated with cleanliness (“she often took up a toy broom to clean away debris indoors and outdoors”), to a good-looking teenager who had little time for her parent’s friends as she made her way through high school and then through the University of Chicago, from where she graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in Visual Arts and Art History, a period during which I rarely saw her except on occasional visits home.


     Her senior thesis concerned issues of feminism and fashion in contemporary photography, the later interest in which I am sure was encouraged through her close relationship with where grandmother, Sherry Bernstein who remained a kind of elderly fashion figure until her death. As part of her thesis, she exhibited a photographic series titled Masquerade, works of which were later exhibited at A.I.R. Galley in New York City, at the Smart Museum in Chicago, and at the University of Chicago.

      At the University she was photo-editor of the Chicago Maroon and was featured in The New York Times for her work in Vita Excolatur, a University of Chicago erotica magazine.

    Henry Hills made a film around her, Emma’s Dilemma, which began with her interviewing significant figures in 1997 when she was only 12, and was completed finally in 2002.

      Hills writes of that film:

 

“She had just turned 12 in 1997 when we began shooting. The project was to consist of her interviewing a range of artists about their work. Poet Jackson Mac Low was the first subject, followed after a few months by interviews with Ken Jacobs and Richard Foreman which became separate films, Nervous Ken (2003) and King Richard (2004). We continued working together on a more or less regular basis until she was 16 and then did a final shoot the next year.

     As we progressed I felt the main center of focus subtly shifting from my artist subjects to my teen protagonist. I had all along intended to take an experimental (rather than documentary) approach to the interview material, to fragment and reassemble it in various ways, frequently riffing on the subjects' own work, exploring qualities of this new medium of digital video. In this final version these explorations strangely function as interstitial material.

      When an exhibit of Emma's polaroids was announced at Microscope Gallery in Brooklyn, my longtime dear friend, poet Charles Bernstein, Emma's father, asked me to put together some unseen outtakes out of the 30 or so hours I had shot with Emma. I took this opportunity to finally finish this project which had lain dormant for so many years.”

       Emma also worked as a curatorial assistant in the Photography, Contemporary Art, and Prints & Drawings departments at the Art Institute of Chicago, at the Renaissance Society, and was a docent at the Smart Museum. She was a Teaching Artist at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago, and was a mentor for Step Up Women’s Network. In New York City, she was a docent at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum. A.I.R. Gallery has named one of its yearly Emerging Artist’s Fellowship Program Awards in her honor.

      Belladonna #4, which features Bernstein’s writing and photographs, was published by Belladonna Books in 2009. GirlDrive: Criss-Crossing America, Mapping Feminism by Emma Bee Bernstein and Nona Willis Aronowitz was published by Seal Press in October 2009.

      And then, a tragic event which shall always remain inexplicable and confusing, happened. In December 2008, while working as intern at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice, Italy, Emma committed suicide.

      The piece below was begun soon after I received a call from the Bernstein’s friend Nick Piombino and talked with both Charles and Susan on December 20th.

 

Los Angeles, November 4, 2022

 

 

*

 

The saddest event for me in a very distressing year was a telephone call from my dear friends Charles Bernstein and Susan Bee on the afternoon of Saturday, December 20th, reporting that their daughter Emma had died in Venice at the age of 23.

     She had gone to Venice to work as an intern at the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, but despite that achievement and a recent contract with Seal Press for the publication of GirlDrive, a photographic and written tour of the country she made with her friend Nona Willis Aronowitz, Emma had been recently depressed, a condition apparently exacerbated by a car accident during the summer. Her father had flown to Venice to see her, spending some days with her touring cathedrals and museums, where she delighted in pointing out to her father the dazzling beauty of the art.

      The family spoke with her every day, sometimes several times, but just before her death they had not been able to reach her where she was staying, finally deciding to call her at the museum. Emma had taken a break from work, and the person they reached said she had left work early because she was not feeling well. A few hours later, when they called back, they found out that Emma had committed suicide in the museum.

       I feel uneasy even describing these events, because I would rather think that she was incapable of such acts, particularly given her ebullient personality and the deep love she felt for her family—and theirs for her. Emma seemingly had everything to live for: she was beautiful, highly gifted intellectually and artistically, and a naturally curious being who seemed destined to achieve acclaim in creative endeavors she had already begun.

       For several years, beginning when she was only 12 years of age, film director Henry Hills had documented a series of interviews she conducted with major creative figures, including Susan Howe, Richard Foreman, Tony Oursler, Bruce Andrews, Fiona Templeton, Jackson Mac Low, and others. That film, Emma’s Dilemma, had recently premiered to laudatory reviews, particularly noting Emma’s ability to ask probing and unusual questions that brought fascinating and revealing responses from her interviewees.



     Howard and I had been out that afternoon of December 20th buying a Christmas tree, and were just beginning the ritual of hanging ornaments upon it—one of my favorite activities of each year—when the Bernstein’s close friend Nick Piombino called from their apartment in New York where he had rushed to comfort them upon hearing the news. I talked briefly to Charles, who wept at some length. Susan was unable to speak.

     When the conversation ended, I turned to Howard and also burst into tears. It was a sad evening, and all night I stayed awake trying to understand why Emma, who had seemed so indomitable for so much of her life, would have brought it to such a tragic ending.

      I was reminded that just the day before I had had lunch with Diane Ward, who asked after Emma (she was soon to perform in the same series that Emma, Susan, and Marjorie Perloff planned to celebrate for another of Emma’s books, published by the feminist press Belladonna). I had known Emma from her birth, and watched her all the years of her young girlhood, but had not seen her often since she gone off to the University of Chicago, from which she graduated with honors in 2007.

      “I don’t know,” I told Diane. “I’ll have to ask Charles and Susan.”

    Now I suddenly knew that she had been suffering, suffering from something that, as her father expressed it in his eulogy at her funeral, “grabbed hold of her hand and would not let go, no matter how fiercely she fought... We know Emma was always fierce so let it not go unacknowledged that in her last moments she struggled fiercely and with all her soul against something more powerful than she had ever known. Emma showed the same courage in her last days as she did throughout her life; the courage that made her seem to herself invincible and to us indomitable – a blazing force of nature, a fiery comet that lit up our lives, burning so bright it sometimes blinded, sometimes scalded, burning until suddenly, catastrophically, the ball of fire that she was expired.”

      On the 21st, I again called the Bernsteins, this time talking to Charles’ mother Sherry, as well as Charles, Susan, and their son Felix. All were suffering awfully, but Susan was clearly having the most difficult time of it, repeating, as I had the night before, “why? why? why?” The family was now faced with the difficulty of retrieving Emma’s body from Italy. Fortunately, the head of the museum had had experience, in the instance of Peggy Guggenheim’s death.

      All that night I kept wishing that what we all knew to be true, that she had in fact died, was a lie, that somehow it had been a terrible mistake, an error of reporting, that she would somehow rise like Lazarus from the event and return to her parents and friends.

      Strangely, when Emma was only two years of age, I wrote a poem for her that was titled “Lazarus: A Parable,” a poem beginning with a created maxim of my Maxims from My Mother’s Milk:

 

                   To write is to bring the lie of life upright.

                   ____________________________

 

                

                   lazarus: a parable

                                                   for Emma Bee Bernstein

 

                   Now you are

                   To become E

                   Ventually who

                   ‘ve only begun

                   To uncover, slip

                   The blanket back

                   Rise, walk

                   Before their eyes

                   Become adjusted

                   To your size, speak

                   Against the old wives’

                   Tales told you

                   About this place, there’s a door

                   A street. Everyone’s hungry.

                   Meat the earth

                   With your feat!

 

It was not really about a death and resurrection for me at the time, but about the wonder of a child growing up so quickly before our eyes to become someone different from anyone in the past, a person who could represent sustenance of the human race through their acts, acts undefined by the past.

     Emma was, in fact, such a person, a young woman who would “meat/meet” the earth with her achievements. But now she would not rise, like Lazarus, no matter how much we might wish. She had been taken down by some inner demon who would not let her go. Her father described such a terrible situation in his moving eulogy:  

 

“I wish I could use some black magic, fueled by all our grief, and bring Emma back. I wish, like, Orpheus, I could go now to the underworld to call her back to life, as my trip to Venice now seems like a journey to Hades, travelling alone by boat to a dream-like world of water and labyrinthine streets in a vain effort to rescue her. And yet every day I think there must be a way, that of all people, Emma, like the Houdini she was, would find a way; only to have such idle waves of compulsive thoughts smashed on the shores of reality.”

 

      Emma, it is now clear, was being torn by the inner and outer self. On one hand she could describe her book as being “about gutsy young women across the American cityscape. It’s about the past and the present, and it glimmers on the future. It’s about the promise of the open road.” And yet, as she revealingly wrote in her essay “What I Learned in School Today: A Soliloquy of Sorts,” Emma felt an irrefutable pull between that gutsy future and her inner self: “All inner and outer life finds itself irresolvable,” she writes. “Attempts at talking through the images and through words are always rendered through a web of misunderstanding; the requirement of a medium in all communication always necessarily dilutes and warps the message. ...[there is a] fundamental disconnect between our inner cognition and our image in the mirror.”

      What we saw as a young women with endless potentiality was also a being inwardly suffering. Now we are left by her silence. For those of us still here, that silence—given the marvelous voice of hers that we remember—is nearly unbearable. The void is something that will be with us forever.

      Her brother, 16-year-old Felix, was the wisest of all, even while singing at the funeral the poignant Cole Porter ode to loss, “Everytime We Say Goodbye,” advising his parents that they must not think of Emma’s death, but of her life. The first two paragraphs of Felix’s own statements about Emma’s death clearly testify to immense possibilities recognized in youth:

 

"I can’t help thinking of the line, 'When one door closes, another opens,' and what that has meant to me in the past few weeks. One door has closed, just as all my doors were opening, all my lights turning on. And now to go through those doors is going to mean something entirely different. My path was disrupted yet has not changed. My destiny will have a loss in its memory, to be the background of whatever my foreground becomes. But I walk the path just the same, learning to embrace the shadows that follow me. Emma’s writings suggested that one must be despite polarities. One such polarity, life and death, is something that will be hard to ignore. Yet I will persist in my loving of Emma. Our love was never constrained to life and death, anyway, and it won’t start now.   

       How artists around me have understood this demonstrates how coping requires you to find the process that means the most to you. I sang at the funeral – “Everytime We Say Goodbye.” To the audience it may have been a comfort to hear a musical expression of their grief. To me it was a comfort to express my doors paradox: As I said goodbye, it was time for me to say hello, to announce myself as an adult to the over 400 people present and to sing in front of them: expose my destiny to them."

 

       As pained as we all are about the death of this beautiful young woman, Felix, I suggest, is right. Despite those darker pulls on our souls, we must all move through that new door. As I tried to tell Emma in that long-ago poem: “About this place, there’s a door / A street”; we each have no choice but to walk through the doors to our destinies.

Los Angeles, January 3, 2003


Wednesday, October 16, 2024

John Ashbery | The Pick-Up || Life In Duluth || The Gesture Always Hides the Truth


john ashbery

1927-2017

 

the pick-up

 

As I mention in My Year 2004, I first met John Ashbery at a reading of his work in 1977 at Folio Books in Washington, D.C. If my memory serves me, I believe I merely introduced myself, speaking highly of his poetry; he was beloved by nearly all the poets of our reading circle, and was particularly influential upon the writing of Bernard Welt, Diane Ward, and Doug Lang, the last of whom organized the readings.

     I did keep in touch with John, moreover, over the next years, sending him issues of Sun & Moon magazine, and a couple of years later, I published two prose poems in Sun & Moon, which I believe I then described as micro-fictions.

     And I must have been in touch with him in the early 1980s since in 1983 I included his short work “Description of a Masque” in my Contemporary American Fiction anthology, published by my Sun & Moon Press in that year.


 Photo Credit: Lynn Davis


     I recall that he was invited for a dinner in Washington, D. C. soon after, I believe by Marjorie Perloff, but I have no memory of the actual event, and I have the feeling that Howard and I did not attend. Another fellow graduate student, Donald Duncan, however, had been there, and someone who had attended (perhaps Marjorie herself) reported the next day that John and he had played “footsy” throughout most of the meal, a story which I felt was quite hilarious.

    That same day, sitting at my desk in the large “bull-pen” I shared with numerous other graduate student teachers, I was told that I was wanted on the phone. The fellow student who’d picked up the call, whispered, in awe, “It’s John Ashbery.”

     John wanted the telephone number of Donald! I chuckled and gave it out. I don’t know if they ever did get together, and I resisted asking Don about the event. Perhaps John only wanted to establish a friendship, or, if the gossip was correct, maybe we wanted to apologize.  I report all of this, indeed, with some hesitancy given my admiration for John’s long-time partner, David Kermani, who has had to deal throughout their years together with John’s fabled alcoholism—a disease, I should add, I shared. Does it truly matter?

    In the 1990s I published a large selection of John’s poetry, with his approval of my selection, in my anthology, From the Other Side of the Century: A New American Poetry 1960-1990. And I continued to correspond irregularly with him throughout those years.

    At some point during those years, I mentioned Ashbery in the context of my Sun & Moon Press as a gay poet, perhaps even including him in the context of several others such as Frank O’Hara, James Schuyler, and perhaps even Allen Ginsberg. Many of the major gay writers and other artistic figures who had come to national notice beginning in the late 1940s and 1950s has a very uncomfortable relationship with broadcasting their own sexuality. While anyone in their sometimes vast literary circles knew that they were gay, they did not announce the fact in their own general work or correspondences, in part, because of the still strong homophobic attitudes that dominated the times, but also because they didn’t want their sexuality to define and describe their own writings and compositions. The early hostile reactions in the early 1960s to gay writers, composers, and artists outlined in Michael S. Sherry’s Gay Artists in Modern American Culture: An Imagined Conspiracy (2002), made clear, given the attacks of figures as various as Edward Albee, Tennessee Williams, Allen Ginsberg, Samuel Barber, Gian-Carlo Menotti and numerous others, that it might be better to remain somewhat closeted.

    Coming of age in the twilight of that gay closeted age, and recognizing fully the talents of the writers, artists, and composers with which I was then involved, I had no longer any such reservations, and simply presumed, rather naively I now realize, that someone like Ashbery would be delighted to finally be identified with a generation of other gay man and lesbians who had now become well known, including Gertrude Stein and Djuna Barnes, both figures central to my own publishing.

    But more savvy New York City figures such as Charles Bernstein, were amused by my actions, Charles somewhat humorously observing that I had been the one who “outed” John.

    Ashbery never spoke of my unintentional “outing,” nor did we ever discuss his gay activities, even if he had personally called me about a possible gay hook-up. He must have perceived me as the totally out young man I was, who have lived a fairly wild gay life in New York City in the late 1960s and who was now living an openly in a gay relationship with my long-time husband, Howard.

    In the immediate years after, I dined with John twice at Marjorie Perloff’s house at intimate dinners, with only Marjorie, me, and another younger gay poet whom she’d invited provided he’d drive John home at the close of the evening. In both of these occasions, John seemed quite sober and talked easily about poetry and everyday events. He is soft-spoken with a wonderful sense of humor. I also didn’t treat him like the celebrity he was, refusing to probe into his long-ago friendships with O’Hara and other notables. I treated Ashbery more as a contemporary friend than as a curious academic. The reason I don’t remember what we discussed is simply that we talked as ordinary friends. I resisted even asking him to send me poems for publication, knowing that he had major publishing houses interested in his work.

    If only I had met John in 1969 when I was living in New York City, leaving the city just a week before Stonewall. But I knew little about poetry in those days, and his name might not even have registered. But I was intelligent enough that I would have quickly caught on, and perhaps cute enough to attract his eye.

    I also saw John read on a couple of more occasions, one of which was memorable because midway through the reading in downtown Los Angeles with Peter Gizzi, he stopped and announced, “I have to pee.” We waited for quite a while, finally be told that he had fallen in the bathroom. Soon after, he returned and simply continued his reading as if nothing unusual had happened. I do believe his lover David Kermani and accompanied him on this trip; but if I remember correctly, he was justifiably angry with the situation, and didn’t even rush to check on John’s survival. Living with an alcoholic certainly does change one’s empathy in such situations.

    I was pleased to be invited once more to a small gathering with John on April 12, 2001 at my friend Martin Nakell and Rebecca Goodman’s home, and could share an evening again with him. John had been feted at Chapman University, where he had been that year’s guest speaker, an event which, because of the distance to the city of Orange, in the county south of Los Angeles, I had skipped.

    I am sure Howard had also been invited, but either he was busy or simply wanted to have a night in, so I invited my former senior editor, Diana Daves to join me as she had at numerous such events. We often joked that I was her other husband, and she, mine.


                                                                           Photo Credit: Douglas Messerli


     As usual, Marty and his wife Rebecca were running behind schedule, so our guest had not yet been delivered to the house. Since Diana and I had arrived before everyone else, they asked if we might pick up John at this hotel. We readily agreed, and set off.

     John and David were staying at the Bel Age, an elegant hotel on North San Vicente that was very close to the Nakell’s condominium. Meanwhile, Marty had telephoned John, letting him know that we were on our way.       

     The Bel Age sign is nearly invisible as one travels south on San Vicente, and I was convinced anyway that we were heading much further south, since I had long ago confused two different locations. At one time the Bel Age had contained a restaurant called L’Ermitage, and, accordingly, in some vague reverie, I directed Diana to drive several blocks south to Burton Way, where the Raffles L’Ermitage hotel stood. Checking at the front desk, we found no John Ashbery was staying there! What to do?

     Since Marty had mentioned that the hotel was quite near his home, we determined to scour Sunset Blvd. With the density of traffic and long pauses at several stop lights, more than a half-hour had slipped by, and by the time we reached Sunset and San Vicente, another ten minutes had passed—all in the time of what should have been a two-minute trip.

    Sure enough, there was the Bel Age! As we drove into the driveway, Diana called out to our poet friends: “You wanna ride, boys?”

    “Where were you?” John asked. “We took the Rio Route,” I quipped. I tried to explain our roundabout voyage and the cause of the confusion. He laughed, but clearly felt somewhat annoyed that he should be so late to his own celebration. Clearly, I had lost the art of “picking up.”

     The good company at Marty’s and the hefty amount of liquor we all consumed quickly brought him back to high spirits. The food was excellent, and the liquor flowed so quickly that Becky had to sneak out to buy some more gin. Their filled liquor cabinet had been emptied.

    At one point John announced that in the morning he was traveling to read at Berkeley. “They’re such phonies up there,” he declared, “that I’ll fit right in!”

   Later, Marty challenged John to a tequila-tasting contest, and the two of them drank late into the night as we and other guests said goodbye and slipped away. Both he and John, he told me latter, had to stop on the three-block trip back to the hotel to pee in the bushes on that major Los Angeles thoroughfare, and accordingly the trip back to the hotel also took longer than anyone might have imagined.

  It’s true that distances are deceptive in Los Angeles, especially when you travel by car, but that night it must have appeared to John and David that their hotel existed in some sort of time warp.

   As late as 2015, John and I were still communicating. That year I decided to publish an entirely new “Little Anthology of US Poetry,” writing to many of my dearest poetry friends. John was particularly generous, given that by that time his poetry had become so very popular, sending me two new poems for inclusion, “Featurette” and “Anxious Music.” I think he later asked if he might print one of the two poems elsewhere, to which I immediately agreed.

    His death, two years later was not a total surprise, but washed over me as an intense sadness. His writing, although always profound, reminded me continuously of the wit, clever thinking, and indelible timing of so many gay men of his age—you see I am still, alas, defining him by his sexuality—who met up, drank, laughed and partied many a night to survive the cold realities of their everyday experiences. John was a truly gay poet, in the older meaning of that word, as brilliant and broad-ranging as his work nonetheless was. Like Frank O’Hara, John was always a member of a world that was somewhat cloistered, men and women who could take any situation in life, any language you might speak, and turn it over into an entire universe of complex associations and possible meanings, forcing you to perceive, for before the “language poets,” that spoken words were themselves how we think, were the always-ready tools to comprehend the experience of our lives. The reader was asked to move his or her mind as quickly as the constantly shifting and almost always humorously challenging brains of such individuals. Their form of “collage” became a way of reconfiguring the constant infusion of the images, languages, and actions of themselves and their friends into the very significance and essence of meaning in a world that often seemingly had forgotten how to think. Nearly every poem and work of fiction that John wrote was a voyage into a universe of new possibilities of significance, one which invited us to imagine and just plainly think.

 

Los Angeles, May 2, 2009; October 16. 2024

 

 

*

 

life in duluth

John Ashbery and James Schuyler Nest of Ninnies (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1969)

 

Ashbery and Schuyler begin their fiction in what seems, at first, an almost conventional mode. Two people, Alice and Marshall, sit at the dinner table, gently arguing, a conversation that appears to be between husband and wife. He, quite obviously, goes to the city every day to work, while she, a 1950s housewife, it seems, is dissatisfied with life in a New York suburban community, “fifty miles from a great city.”


Fairfield Porter: John Ashbery and James Schuyler


   Alice seems bored, languid at the very least, disinterested in the leftovers that Marshall has pulled from the refrigerator for their supper. Poutingly, she refuses to eat, wanting to go to the city. Marshall himself is described as sulking, seeking a missing bread basket in which serve hot bread. Indeed, pouting, sulking, wounding seems to the major activity of these two, until they are interrupted by a woman, Fabia, from next door, at which point Marshall seems to come alive while Alice retreats to the basement to shake their furnace into action. Before long a fuse has blown and a snowstorm has begun, the three heading off to a hardware store and to a nearby Howard Johnson’s for a drink.

     Throughout Nest of Ninnies, in fact, storms—both meteorologically and emotionally—are abrew. None of the characters might be described as emotionally stable, and the weather, no matter where these figures go, is generally filled with rain, snow, ice, and wailing winds. And many of them are perpetually drink.

     In this first chapter, moreover, we quickly discover that whatever one might think are the facts have nothing to do with reality—if there is reality in their world to be found. Language, in particular makes no true connections. In the first few pages I’ve described above the characters speak more by association than through any attempt to truly communicate:

 

                 “We of course made no attempt to alter this old place when we took

                 it over, beyond a few slight repairs,” Marshall seemed aware of the

                 young woman for the first time. “I wanted to have the fireplace bricked

                 up because it cools the house, but so many people commented on it

                 we decided to leave it.”

                      “You don’t seem to see so many people.”

                      “Look, snow is coming down it now.”

                      An especially loud clang from the basement caused them both to

                 start. “You sit down and I’ll get you a cup of coffee. I’ll put on the lights

                 and call Alice,” Marshall announced.

                      Alice’s dim form appeared in the door. “I think I’ve just blown a

                 fuse. Hello, Fabia.”

                     “That’s very funny. The fuses at our house blew out too. It must be

                 general.”

 

     As we move forward into this strangely charted territory, we gradually begin to meet other characters, Fabia’s brother Victor, who has just dropped out of college, her parents, The Bridgewaters, while we discover that the quarreling couple of the first scene are not husband and wife, but sister and brother, Marshall being somewhat attracted to Fabia, while Alice is interested in the wayward Victor.

     As these characters (types more than flesh-and-blood figures) are established, we begin to suspect that the fiction will be a kind of domestic story of their interchanging relationships and lives. But after a few chapters, in which the characters half-heartedly attempt to settle down (Marshall is the only one, it appears, who has a job), Ashbery and Schuyler take the work in an entirely different direction.

     Just as we grow used to the small cast of figures he has presented us, they quickly begin to gather others around them as they move forward in space, first to Florida, then to Paris, Italy, back to New York, and away again, floating in an out of their original home while adding more and more figures as they go.



     One might argue that, after the first few scenes, Ashbery and Schuyler pick up on Henry Green’s marvelous Party Going just where it ended, with a large party of figures finally ready to move on. That group of ninnies is perhaps more British than is this American grouping, but there are enough French acquaintances, Italian pickups, Pen Pals (does anyone remember when young men and women had Pen Pals?), school girls, and numerous others to create a hilarious international “nest” into which and out of which the figures come and go, just as in Green’s fiction.

     If the language these characters use is absurdly associative and self-centric, so too are their actions. Time and again characters meet and accidently reencounter each other as if the whole of Europe and the US were just as small as the suburban New York community in which the work begins and ends.

     Just as absurdly, in the latter part of the book, the figures pair off in odd combinations we might never have expected, Alice marrying an Italian pick-up, Giorgio, who together open a restaurant; Irving Kelso, a mama’s boy and Marshall’s co-worker, marrying a French woman the group has met in Florida, Claire; while Claire’s sister pairs up with Victor.

     Victor’s Pen Pal, Paul, meanwhile, arrives at novel’s end with Marshall, the two having evidently traveled to Duluth and South Bend! As all the other figures move off in the various directions their lunatic behavior leads them, Marshall announces that he may move to Duluth; Duluth, he reveals, is big in plastics, and his company (evidently producing or using plastics) wants to open up a new branch in that Northern Minnesota City.

 

                      I have eyes only for Duluth. That’s a place where they really

                      know how to relax and get the most out of life. I could even

                      live there myself. You never saw such steaks.

 

 Paul announces, in turn, that he likes the US and may not return to his home in France.  Both speak of the delights of South Bend.

 

                     Meanwhile Fabia was saying to Paul, “What was there in South

                     Bend, anyway?”

                         “You won’t believe this,” Paul said, “but it’s true: a Pam-Pam’s!”

                         “Oh,” Fabia allowed.

 

The cryptic reference to the international bar and restaurant chain suggests far more that it appears, perhaps even hinting how to read through the characters’ scatter-brained references.

     Bar Pam-Pam’s was a kind of early bar and coffee house scene somewhat in the manner of Starbucks today, except that several of the Bar Pam-Pam’s operations played cool jazz and catered to special audiences.* Cartoonist Joe Ollmann writes in The Paris Review about a local Pam-Pam’s in New York which he describes as an “old man bar,” suggesting to me that its clientele are elderly gays. What Ashbery and Schuyler seem to suggest, accordingly, is that suddenly Marshall and Paul are an couple who perhaps may be the first to escape the loony nest into which the dozens of characters have fast settled.

     After having just feasted on Giorgio’s special courses, Victor suggests in the final lines of the book, perhaps hinting at the new relationship between the two men:

 

                    “I’m so hungry I could eat a wolf. Why don’t we go over the Gay

                    Chico and have some refried beans?”

 

      And so these “cliff dwellers” bid their goodnights, moving off toward the parking lots and shopping plazas of their empty lives. Life in Duluth might be just the tonic.

 

*Steve Fletcher describes a Bar Pam-Pam in England on the internet:

 

The refectory in the college had about as much atmosphere as a cemetery with lights, so a girl student with whom I was highly smitten, Diane, suggested we go to the Pam Pam. A coffee bar.  

     It was just across Oxford Circus at the junction with Hanover Street and Hanover Square and the exterior had a South East Asian look about it which was continued on the inside with low lighting, bamboo and palm trees in jungle browns and greens.

    The Pam Pam was quite small; it had about half a dozen very low tables and behind the counter was the first coffee machine I had ever seen. (There was a small upstairs section too over the counter with no more that three tables).

     Scandinavian open sandwiches were the house speciality (and the only ones on offer) consisting of a piece of rye bread topped with a piece of lettuce, a tomato and a hard-boiled egg or a sardine – very exotic.

     A bit pricey too, I seem to remember. But the owner, a Spaniard, was never in a hurry to get rid of poor students. He also played music: jazz. Not on a juke box but on a Dansette 78 r.p.m. record player behind the counter.

     He had great taste and I was always asking him what the records were, his favourites being the boogie inspired piano pieces by Oscar Peterson. Cool sounds in a cool place.

     The Pam Pam was different and quite unlike the other coffee house I was now also frequenting – the infamous French coffee/newspaper shop near the corner of Old Compton and Charing Cross Road, and the Gyre & Gimbleat at Charing Cross.

     There one could rub shoulders with hookers, villains and dealers – plus the likes of Victor Passmore, Francis Bacon, Lucien Freud and demi-monde characters like Quentin Crisp and Ironfoot Jack.

     Because it was just outside Soho and on the edges of Mayfair, which was relatively quiet at night, the Pam Pam seemed a bit exclusive to the art students of RSP. I hung out there for about a year and became an ardent modern jazz fan.

 

Los Angeles, November 8, 2011

 

 

 

*

 

 

the gesture always hides the truth

 

While working on a collection of poetry in 2000, I wrote “through” several poems by John Ashbery creating an original poem which I titled “The Decibels.” My goal in that volume, later assimilated into by collection of poetry title Writing Through was to send the poems I had written to the writers, asking them in turn to either write through the poem I had written about them or to write through my own poetry.

    John did write back a very gracious note, responding that he could not find the time to write in response. Yet, he commented: “’The Decibels’ seem to me to be a poem that I haven’t written yet and would like to write, rather than a poem in imitation of my style (whatever that is). I still hope to write this poem.” I felt that Ashbery totally comprehended what I was attempting to do.

    I’ve reprinted the poem below.

 

 

The Decibels

                        for John Ashbery

 

Surface bends to the restless shifting

of new arrivals. Our equators glow

with the human heat. No one had imagined

the storm to be like this! Hasn’t the sky?

 

The gesture always hides the truth,

suspecting, perhaps, what has been

assigned to it or drawn from it into the dark

shadow where it sits. Every utterance

is half-meant, half-absent, half-full

as amass. You woke up this morning

pissing yourself over the gulf.

 

And the voyage? I am convinced

there are some things of importance.

In the tunnel you placed all those pleasures.

You hyped the embarrassment back

and even, if I am not imagining it, laughed!

Another example of how different

each of us is. All those people,

 

all those faces, all those hands!

As the majestic ship pulled away,

we wondered why had everyone gone

as suddenly. With all that coming

and going, how can chivalry be sustained?

There is nothing left but coffee

and whiskey and cigarette butts.

 

We sit out the sunporch to its solitary light.

Keeping warm now is our primary occupation,

lengthening the arch.  Does the foot jump?

It’s quiet, too quiet to scream.

 

Los Angeles, April 29, 2000


Frank Gehry | The Aerie

frank geary 1929-2025 the aerie by Douglas Messerli   The Walt Disney Concert Hall by night   In 2002 Howard and I were invited to the...